Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is just a bit better than LG K92's 85.4 global score. Galaxy Note10's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG K92, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit further than a year before. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
LG K92 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better performance than LG K92, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG K92 takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The LG K92 features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K92. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG K92, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.