Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than the LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. Although the Galaxy Note10 and LG Q70 were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Note10 is lighter and a little thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density. LG Q70 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 32 megapixels resolution.
The LG Q70 has more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q70. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note10, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q70, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.