Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. The Galaxy Note10 is a newer cellphone than the LG V30S ThinQ, although it is a bit heavier and a little thicker. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note10 features a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a worse video definition and a way less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Note10 costs a little more than LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.