Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. The Galaxy Note10 construction is newer and just a bit lighter, but also just a little thicker than LG V40 ThinQ. LG V40 ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the processor in Galaxy Note10, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bit larger display. The LG V40 ThinQ and Galaxy Note10 count with incredibly similar cameras, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a F1.5 diafragm aperture, a same resolution back camera and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note10 features a little better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.