Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ's score of 87.6. Even when Samsung Galaxy Note10 and LG V60 ThinQ were released only a few months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note10 is somewhat thinner and much lighter. The Galaxy Note10 and the LG V60 ThinQ have really similar screens, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy Note10, both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution, a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a lot higher video resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG V60 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.