Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is just a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it's a little thicker and was released many years before. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit better pixels count per inch of display and a bit larger display.
Galaxy Note10 features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note10 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a lot higher video definition and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.