Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with an 89 score against 83.4. Galaxy Note10 is an a lot older phone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 and the Motorola Edge 40 Pro both feature really similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 31 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.