Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with an 89 score against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an notably older device than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung could make it just a little lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a higher resolution of 1256 x 2760, a quite greater display density and a little bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Galaxy Note10, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features improved battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.