Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 overall score. Although the Galaxy Note10 is older than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's design is just a bit thinner and lighter. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a much more mega pixels back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.