Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting an 89 score against 87.1. Galaxy Note10 is an way older phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter and a little thinner. The Galaxy Note10 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.