Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's general score of 81.5. Galaxy Note10's body is notably thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G 5G, despite of the fact that it was released just 16 months before. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G also counts with a way more MP camera.
The Moto G 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.