Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Galaxy Note10's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy Note10 features a bit better display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Moto G Power counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Power, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.