Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is slightly better than the Moto G200 5G's score of 86.2. The Galaxy Note10 is an extremely older cellphone than the Moto G200 5G, but Samsung was able to build it thinner and somewhat lighter. The Moto G200 5G has a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note10. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 and Moto G200 5G count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Moto G200 5G has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.