Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Moto G8 Power, getting an 89 score against 76. The Galaxy Note10 construction is lighter and thinner than Moto G8 Power, even when both of them were released with only 8 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note10 features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note10 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note10 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a much lower resolution camera, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G8 Power. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto G8 Power, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.