Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than Moto G9 Play, having an 89 score against 76.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older than the Moto G9 Play, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. Galaxy Note10 features a better display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note10 counts with more storage to store more apps and games than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play has a much better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Moto G9 Play shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.