Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, having a overall score of 89 against 78.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's body is thinner and incredibly lighter. Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 has a better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a much better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Moto G9 Power features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Moto G9 Power takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G9 Power features a superior battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.