Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Galaxy Note10's construction is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it's just a little heavier and just a little thicker. Moto Z Force features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy Note10. Galaxy Note10 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.