Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-08-23 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's general score of 76.4. Galaxy Note10's construction is incredibly newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, although it is a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. Galaxy Note10 has a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lower video resolution and a way lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in Galaxy Note10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.