Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-08-23 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 89 score against 77.4. Galaxy Note10's construction is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is somewhat heavier and a lot thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy Note10 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a camera with a 12 megapixels and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a lot larger aperture, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
Galaxy Note10 costs more money than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.