Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-08-23 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is way newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's somewhat heavier and a lot thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit lower pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega pixels camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.