Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is newer than Moto Z3 Play, it's a bit heavier and thicker. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size camera sensor and the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has higher video frame rates and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Moto Z3 Play counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note10 features just a little bit longer battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.