Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's general score of 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 construction is thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola One 5G Ace, even though it was released just 17 months before. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density.
The Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images in low light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.