Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola One Action's overall score of 78.5. Even when the Galaxy Note10 and the Motorola One Action were only released 0 months apart, the Galaxy Note10 is a bit lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM.
Motorola One Action counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola One Action also has a little bit greater pixel amount per screen inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Action counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note10 takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Note10 also has faster video frame rates and a bigger aperture. The Motorola One Action's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy Note10.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Action, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.