Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is better than Motorola One Hyper, getting an 89 score against 79.8. The Galaxy Note10 construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola One Hyper, even though they were only released with a few months difference. The Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a lot tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.