Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 89 score against 80.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note10 and Motorola One Vision were released with only 3 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a little bit thinner and a little lighter. Galaxy Note10 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola One Vision also has a just a little better pixel amount per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution. Motorola One Vision counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision and Galaxy Note10 have similar battery durations. The Motorola One Vision takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.