Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 400 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is much better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s score of 79.2. Galaxy Note10 has a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Galaxy Note10 has a much faster processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.