Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. The Galaxy Note10 is a somewhat thinner and way lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were released with only 2 months difference. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note10 one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with as much memory for games and applications as the Galaxy Note10, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.