Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than OPPO Find X2, having an 89 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X2, but both are 0.31inches thick. The OPPO Find X2 has a little better processing power than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution. OPPO Find X2 has a much better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X2's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note10's one, both of them have equal internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.