Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a general score of 89 against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is just a little lighter than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it is just a bit thicker and was released just 9 months before. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little greater pixels quantity in each inch in the display. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy Note10, both have the same internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 15 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.