Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. Galaxy Note10's body is lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even though they were released with only a few months difference. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a better display pixels density, a little bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.