Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's score of 82.1. The Galaxy Note10 is an much older device than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2280px resolution.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy A13 5G has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.