Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Galaxy A16 5G, getting a overall score of 89 against 76.2. The Galaxy Note10 is a lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 5G, but both have the same thickness. Galaxy Note10 counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.