Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, with a global score of 89 against 84.6. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a display that's very similar to the display in Galaxy Note10, because although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen. Galaxy Note10 features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.