Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than Galaxy A25 5G, with a overall score of 89 against 79.9. Even though Galaxy Note10 is noticeably older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is just a bit thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A25 5G has a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.