Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A31, with a global score of 89 against 81.3. Even though Galaxy Note10 and the Galaxy A31 were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Note10 is a little thinner and a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy A31 features a display that's very similar to Galaxy Note10's screen, although the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a little better display density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A31 has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower video frame rates and a much tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.