Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-08-23 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than Galaxy A34, getting a overall score of 89 against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A34, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A34 has a screen that is just as good as Galaxy Note10's display, because although the Galaxy A34 has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor which offers a way worse photo and video quality and a way less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.