Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. Galaxy Note10's body is incredibly lighter and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy Note10 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or videos in low light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.