Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A50's 83.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 construction is a little heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A50. Galaxy Note10 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 and the Galaxy A50 count with similar screens, although the Galaxy A50 also has a bit bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A50. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A50, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.