Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50s, with an 89 score against 86.6. Despite being the best device we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 body is just a little heavier and just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a display that is very similar to the display in Galaxy Note10, although the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a quite bigger screen, a just a little higher screen density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A50s has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. Galaxy A50s features a superior camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and video and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.