Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Galaxy A51, having a global score of 89 against 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A51, but it is just a little bit lighter. Galaxy A51 has a screen that's just as good as the Galaxy Note10 one, although the Galaxy A51 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little greater pixel density and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A51 features a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14% more battery capacity. Galaxy A51 features a much better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A51. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A51, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.