Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note10's global score of 89. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Galaxy A51 5G construction is heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note10. Galaxy Note10 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G and Galaxy Note10 have incredibly similar displays, although the Galaxy A51 5G also has a bit larger screen, a little better screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A51 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.