Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. Galaxy Note10's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it is just a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little faster processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has greater battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments, faster video frame rates and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A70. If you want to save some money, you can get Galaxy A70, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.