Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Galaxy A71, with a score of 89 against 87.5. Although Galaxy Note10 and Galaxy A71 were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy Note10's construction is a little lighter but also a little thicker than Galaxy A71. Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The Galaxy Note10 has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A71 has superior battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A71, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A71. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A71, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.