Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy F41's global score of 85.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy F41, although it was released just 14 months before. The Galaxy Note10 features a little faster processor than Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy F41 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a little bit larger screen and a little bit greater pixels density. Galaxy Note10 features a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F41 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy F41 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a camera with way more MP and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.