Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, having an 89 score against 88.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older than the Samsung Galaxy F62, it's design is thinner and extremely lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 100 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.