Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-06-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than Galaxy J8, with an 89 score against 76.7. Galaxy Note10 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy J8. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280px, a little larger screen and a better pixels number per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy J8, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The Samsung Galaxy J8's battery life is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy Note10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.