Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30's 82.4 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 and the Samsung Galaxy M30 were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2280 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also counts with a little greater pixels density. Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a superior camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy M30 has a little bit more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M30 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.