Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M51's 87.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an older phone than the Galaxy M51, but Samsung was able to build it lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per screen inch. Galaxy M51 has a bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M51 features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 100 percent greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.