Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note10's score of 89. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy Note10, but it is heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S10 5G and Samsung Galaxy Note10 count with similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 5G's processing unit is very similar to Galaxy Note10's processor, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a camera that's just as good as Galaxy Note10's camera, both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video resolution, a 0.39 inches sensor and a F1.5 aperture. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has superior battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.