Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S10e's 86.3 global score. The Galaxy Note10 is a heavier phone than Galaxy S10e, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy S10e and Galaxy Note10 count with really similar processors, and although the Galaxy S10e has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2280px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a camera that is just as good as the Galaxy Note10 one, both of them have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate, a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, a F1.5 aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S10e. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S10e, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.